Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test(postgrest): increase code coverage #651

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 31, 2025

Conversation

grdsdev
Copy link
Collaborator

@grdsdev grdsdev commented Jan 28, 2025

This pull request includes several updates to the PostgREST library, focusing on simplifying header and query management, improving JSON serialization, and adding comprehensive test coverage.

Simplification of Header and Query Management:

JSON Serialization Improvements:

Addition of New Tests:

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Jan 28, 2025

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 13052565633

Details

  • 29 of 29 (100.0%) changed or added relevant lines in 4 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage increased (+3.7%) to 60.438%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 13049867283: 3.7%
Covered Lines: 5101
Relevant Lines: 8440

💛 - Coveralls

@grdsdev grdsdev force-pushed the guilherme/postgrest-code-coverage branch from 115194b to e93d10a Compare January 30, 2025 09:54
@grdsdev grdsdev force-pushed the guilherme/postgrest-code-coverage branch from e5a7a74 to e6ae4f2 Compare January 30, 2025 12:41
@grdsdev grdsdev marked this pull request as ready for review January 30, 2025 13:33
@grdsdev grdsdev requested a review from dshukertjr January 30, 2025 13:33
@grdsdev grdsdev enabled auto-merge (squash) January 30, 2025 15:38
@grdsdev grdsdev merged commit ee06810 into main Jan 31, 2025
21 checks passed
@grdsdev grdsdev deleted the guilherme/postgrest-code-coverage branch January 31, 2025 01:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants